To do that, I did a Common Opponent Analysis (COA),
similar to that I did last year for Sectionals, only this time I have
given more weight to games depending on their closeness to the two teams
involved. For example, a head to head game should carry more weight
than a comparison of common opponents, or that of a common opponent of a
common opponent.
I worked on the boys AA, since that's where my
original thought was hatched and did an analysis of each pairing of the
top four teams (Shen, CCHS, Guilderland, and Green Tech). I was going
to do the top 5, but would have had to expand it to 8 or 9 to figure out
who #5 was, and since whoever it is only has a minimal chance at a
title anyway, I didn't think it was worth it. Then, I did an average of
their MOV derived from the COA against each of the other three teams.
As an example, Green Tech and Shen have each played
Colonie and Shaker. Shen had a +7 against Colonie, winning by 19 as
opposed to GT's 12, and a -7 against Shaker, winning by 14 as opposed to
GT's 21. That 0 variance between the two (+7 and -7) was 1/3 of GT and
Shen's score in addition to a similar number for each against both
Guilderland and CCHS.
In short, Green Tech had the highest score with a
6.8, followed by Shen at 3.4, Guilderland at 1.4 and CCHS at -11.6. To
put it another way, GT is 3.4 points better than Shen, 5.4 better than
Guilerland and 18.4 better than CCHS using a comparison against each
other.
To do it right, you would need to do it for every
combination of teams in the AA bracket, but I doubt the ending numbers
would vary much and would be outrageously time consuming. Regardless,
I've been persuaded to believe this should be the top four, in that
order. I've always believed GT was the best of them all, even if by
only a slim margin. I will admit I hadn't given Shen a hard look until
they beat Guilderland, though I did think they were undervalued in the
last Forecast (and as you'll see in the next one). They do get punished
a bit for having such a large enrollment and being good each year,
without a championship to show for it.
As far as putting the undefeated CCHS #4, the
numbers back it up. They have not fared as well against common
opponents as the other 3 have. They are still a young team as well and
have shown to be a little inconsistent. That doesn't mean they aren't
deserving of the praise, nor does it mean they don't have a good chance
to win. Nonetheless, I think it's a fair representation of where things
stand.
No comments:
Post a Comment