In the first game, Albany ended the Suburban's streak of AA championships in impressive style. Unfortunately for Bethlehem it doesn't appear as though they played their best game, but losing to a team as good as Albany should not be viewed negatively. Making the finals of any class in any section is a great accomplishment and also, by the way, really hard to do. After the first game I was wondering if Green Tech could pull off a twin killing in ending the Big 10's AA championship streak as well. While they fell short, there was a bit of vindication for Troy's decision to play in the AA sectionals instead of their rightful A bracket based on enrollment. Early in the season I said how they must feel like they are good enough to win it all or they wouldn't have made that decision and they proved it last night.
Overall the season was a good one and though I didn't accomplish all the goals I had set out at the beginning of the year, I can only be happy with how everything turned out. The forecast did really well and as good as I could expect. If only I could do that well in the NCAA tournament I'd be a lot better off. I look forward to seeing how the girls' model responds to another full season's data and 5 more data points from this year's sectionals. I was a bit worried about even presenting it this year, but considering its flaws due to lack of data I think it can only go up from here. I've tried to be as transparent as possible about the math and its limitations and again, if you haven't, I encourage you to read the methodology page. Without further adieu, the final sectional standings:
Boys
Sectional Forecast Rating 64 9 .877
Sectional Prediction Rating 62 11 .849
Section 2 Committee 60 13 .822
Section 2 Committee 60 13 .822
Common Opponents Analysis 52 21 .712
Girls
Sectional Prediction Rating 55 12 .821
Section 2 Committee 55 12 .821
Common Opponents Analysis 53 14 .791
Sectional Forecast Rating 50 17 .746
As previously stated, there is another element I’m tracking as well and that is for the two regression models. Since they base things on how far a team advances, I wanted to see how well it’s doing when teams crossed those thresholds. In order to advance to the second round, the model would have to give you a score of 0.556. To get to the semifinals, a 0.778 is needed to be achieved. The table below shows how those teams did. For example, there were 17 boys’ teams that had a rating above 0.556, which 16 of them won in the first round. (These ratings were calculated using all the regular season games including those after the brackets were released and none of the sectional games.)
Boys – Sectional Forecast Rating
1st Round 16 1 .941
2nd Round 7 1 .875
3rd Round 1 0 1.000
4th Round 0 0 n/a
Total 24 2 .923
3rd Round 1 0 1.000
4th Round 0 0 n/a
Total 24 2 .923
Boys – Sectional Prediction Rating
1st Round 16 1 .941
2nd Round 7 1 .875
3rd Round 2 0 1.000
4th Round 0 0 n/a
Total 25 2 .926
4th Round 0 0 n/a
Total 25 2 .926
Girls – Sectional Forecast Rating
1st Round 10 3 .769
2nd Round 6 0 1.000
3rd Round 1 0 1.000
4th Round 0 0 n/a
Total 17 3 .850
4th Round 0 0 n/a
Total 17 3 .850
Girls – Sectional Prediction Rating
1st Round 8 2 .800
2nd Round 7 0 1.000
3rd Round 2 0 1.000
4th Round 0 0 n/a
Total 17 2 .895
4th Round 0 0 n/a
Total 17 2 .895
There is one other analysis I’m tracking and that includes the teams the models did not have with necessary rating to advance, but were seeded to advance. So this is a situation where a team had a 0.500 rating, but was seeded 6th for instance. The one caveat here is that, since my seeds aren’t used, I could have teams that played each other even though I have them both advancing. This analysis counts that as both a win and a loss.
Boys – Sectional Forecast Rating
1st Round 12 3 .800
2nd Round 10 2 .833
3rd Round 8 1 .889
4th Round 5 0 1.000
Total 35 6 .854
4th Round 5 0 1.000
Total 35 6 .854
Boys – Sectional Prediction Rating
1st Round 11 5 .688
2nd Round 9 3 .750
3rd Round 7 1 .875
4th Round 4 1 .800
Total 31 10 .756
4th Round 4 1 .800
Total 31 10 .756
Girls – Sectional Forecast Rating
1st Round 5 4 .556
2nd Round 10 4 .714
3rd Round 7 2 .778
4th Round 1 4 .200
Total 23 14 .622
4th Round 1 4 .200
Total 23 14 .622
Girls – Sectional Prediction Rating
1st Round 9 4 .692
2nd Round 5 4 .556
3rd Round 4 4 .500
4th Round 2 3 .200
Total 20 15 .571
Along with some of the items I mentioned in my last post I also anticipate doing a bit more in terms of analyzing how the model and I'll be posting those items when I get them done. I'll also be updating the championship pages and the enrollment page for next year when they come out. Hopefully that will be sooner rather than later.
3rd Round 4 4 .500
4th Round 2 3 .200
Along with some of the items I mentioned in my last post I also anticipate doing a bit more in terms of analyzing how the model and I'll be posting those items when I get them done. I'll also be updating the championship pages and the enrollment page for next year when they come out. Hopefully that will be sooner rather than later.
No comments:
Post a Comment